As a Liberal Conservative, I am naturally cautious of imposing additional taxes or charges on people. However, this is not the only reason that while I support additional investment into public transport, I remain opposed to the proposed Manchester Congestion Charge.
Although I am required to utilise my car quite a lot for my job, I spend a significant amount of time not utilising that form of transport. If I am working in the City Centre, I will catch a bus as I work in a suit, while most of the rest of the time, I will cycle into the City Centre, as it is Green, Healthy, and one of my passions in life. I believe that one of the great causes of congestion and CO2 emissions is people utilising their cars for short journeys, which could easily be done by walking, cycling or public transport.
However, a large number of people in Greater Manchester, including myself, have times when they must use their cars. We shouldn’t penalise these people, who often will be using their cars not for leisure purposes, but to go to work, and through taxes and services be improving the lives of all of us.
An argument often used by the City Council and pro-Toll lobby is that it will help the environment, because it will reduce car journeys. However, they then argue it will encourage people to work flexible, and move their car journeys. Despite these arguments contradicting each other, I disagree with both. I know, from my own and other experience, that flexible working isn’t as easy as it sounds - many services have to be conducted at specific, and usually office, hours. In addition, the Metrolink plan, which focuses on transport into the city centre, will enable people to move their travel onto public transport.
All the Metrolink routes are focuses on Manchester City Centre. While I agree, that this is a major transport link, it is by no means not the only route for everyone. One of the major reasons that the roads from East Manchester through the Mancunian Way onto the M602 is so busy is due to commuters working beyond the city boundaries.
http://www.gmltp.co.uk/pdfs/GMLTP01_02to05_06/metmapfut_14.pdf
The link above shows the map of the ‘future’ Metrolink, although none of that is guaranteed. You can quickly see vast amounts of the Greater Manchester area is excluded from the Metrolink. East Manchester is currently poorly served in transport terms in comparison with most of city - roads are massively congested; there currently isn’t a tram; compared to South Manchester, buses are infrequent and expensive; and cycling can sometimes feel terribly dangerous.
That is why I support the Manchester Conservative policy. A Congestion Charge should remain as it should, a last resort. We should invest in public transport, and as vast a Metrolink as possible. Only then we should look at our infrastructure, and then decide whether we should proceed with an additional tax on motorists. The last Conservative Government planned the current Metrolink as a test to whether it would be successful. Seeing its success, it then promised to continue this expansion. The current New Labour Government has stalled on that investment, and now is offering the cash (of which much will be a Loan, not a Grant) only if we tax our motorists even more. This is scandalous - is London expected to do the same in order to get Crossrail?
We need a City Council which will stand up to Gordon Brown, and demand the investment which is Manchester’s right. The current leadership, whether it be over the Supercasino investment, or the Metrolink investment, will just follow Whitehall’s whims, rather than stand up for Manchester.